Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Reihan Salam's avatar

Thank you for this wonderful, very relatable piece.

Andy G's avatar

Incentives matter.

The bureaucrats who made the decision have far greater incentive to do CYA for their own careers than to do what is in the best interest of the students or the families.

And this is reinforced with social media cancel culture.

Read public choice theory.

I say “don't hate the playah, hate the game”.

Allowing bureaucrats to have that much power to shut down a school over that small an incident, with no charges filed, let alone convictions, is the problem.

Unless, of course, there is a pattern of these occurrences at this school not evidenced in the piece.

But of course NYC voters have been very happy to vote for ever more invasive power in city and state government. So it’s hard for me to feel too bad for the likely large majority of the parents who have surely voted in people who gleefully extol the virtues of the nanny state.

And yes, the irony of the nanny state taking away the nannies in the blink of an eye is not lost on me…

It is even harder for me to have sympathy with authors who claim “We have a coalition to improve housing regulations so that more people can live in our great city. It’s time for the same kind of regulatory reform….”

That they don’t see that “Freeze the rent” is quite literally the opposite of the way to enable more people to live in the city, and that “the same kind of regulatory reform” here will not solve their problem but instead make it worse, is sad indeed.

“We get the government we deserve” would seem to apply here.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?